TY - JOUR
T1 - Who Smells? Forecasting Taste and Odor in a Drinking Water Reservoir
AU - Kehoe, Michael J.
AU - Chun, Kwok P.
AU - Baulch, Helen M.
N1 - Funding information:
This research was supported by an NSERC SPG grant, the Buffalo Pound Water Treatment Plant, Saskatchewan Water Security Agency, and Global Institute for Water Security. Mr. Dan Conrad from the Buffalo Pound Water Administration Board is respectfully acknowledged for providing the raw data used in this study as well as his thoughtful comments on the manuscript. We thank the Buffalo Pound Water Treatment Plant for access to long-term data records, and their meticulous record-keeping, Julie Terry for assistance with map presentation, and support from our funding agencies.
Publisher copyright:
© 2015 American Chemical Society
PY - 2015/9/15
Y1 - 2015/9/15
N2 - Taste and odor problems can impede public trust in drinking water and impose major costs on water utilities. The ability to forecast taste and odor events in source waters, in advance, is shown for the first time in this paper. This could allow water utilities to adapt treatment, and where effective treatment is not available, consumers could be warned. A unique 24-year time series, from an important drinking water reservoir in Saskatchewan, Canada, is used to develop forecasting models of odor using chlorophyll a, turbidity, total phosphorus, temperature, and the following odor producing algae taxa: Anabaena spp., Aphanizemenon spp., Oscillatoria spp., Chlorophyta, Cyclotella spp., and Asterionella spp. We demonstrate, using linear regression and random forest models, that odor events can be forecast at 0-26 week time lags, and that the models are able to capture a significant increase in threshold odor number in the mid-1990s. Models with a fortnight time-lag show a high predictive capacity (R2 = 0.71 for random forest; 0.52 for linear regression). Predictive skill declines for time lags from 0 to 15 weeks, then increases again, to R2 values of 0.61 (random forest) and 0.48 (linear regression) at a 26-week lag. The random forest model is also able to provide accurate forecasting of TON levels requiring treatment 12 weeks in advance-93% true positive rate with a 0% false positive rate. Results of the random forest model demonstrate that phytoplankton taxonomic data outperform chlorophyll a in terms of predictive importance.
AB - Taste and odor problems can impede public trust in drinking water and impose major costs on water utilities. The ability to forecast taste and odor events in source waters, in advance, is shown for the first time in this paper. This could allow water utilities to adapt treatment, and where effective treatment is not available, consumers could be warned. A unique 24-year time series, from an important drinking water reservoir in Saskatchewan, Canada, is used to develop forecasting models of odor using chlorophyll a, turbidity, total phosphorus, temperature, and the following odor producing algae taxa: Anabaena spp., Aphanizemenon spp., Oscillatoria spp., Chlorophyta, Cyclotella spp., and Asterionella spp. We demonstrate, using linear regression and random forest models, that odor events can be forecast at 0-26 week time lags, and that the models are able to capture a significant increase in threshold odor number in the mid-1990s. Models with a fortnight time-lag show a high predictive capacity (R2 = 0.71 for random forest; 0.52 for linear regression). Predictive skill declines for time lags from 0 to 15 weeks, then increases again, to R2 values of 0.61 (random forest) and 0.48 (linear regression) at a 26-week lag. The random forest model is also able to provide accurate forecasting of TON levels requiring treatment 12 weeks in advance-93% true positive rate with a 0% false positive rate. Results of the random forest model demonstrate that phytoplankton taxonomic data outperform chlorophyll a in terms of predictive importance.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84941712021&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1021/acs.est.5b00979
DO - 10.1021/acs.est.5b00979
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 26266956
AN - SCOPUS:84941712021
SN - 0013-936X
VL - 49
SP - 10984
EP - 10992
JO - Environmental Science and Technology
JF - Environmental Science and Technology
IS - 18
ER -