When to use Scott’s π or Krippendorff's α, if ever?

Xinshu Zhao

Research output: Contribution to conferenceConference paper

56 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Scott’s π (1955) and Krippendorff's α (1980) have been among the most-often used or recommended general indicators of reliability. This article presents paradoxes showing that neither can be a general indicator. We show that π or α should be used only when (a) coders enforce a predetermined quota as the first priority and (b) coders maximize chance coding as the second priority. Because the two conditions rarely hold, π or α should rarely be used.

Original languageEnglish
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2011
EventAssociation for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication (AEJMC) 2011 Annual Conference - The Renaissance St. Louis Grand Hotel, St. Louis, United States
Duration: 10 Aug 201113 Aug 2011
http://www.aejmc.com/home/2011/06/2011-abstracts/
https://www.aejmc.com/home/events/post-conference-info/ (Conference website)
http://www.aejmc.org/home/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/2011-Conference-Program.pdf (Conference program)

Conference

ConferenceAssociation for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication (AEJMC) 2011 Annual Conference
Country/TerritoryUnited States
CitySt. Louis
Period10/08/1113/08/11
Internet address

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'When to use Scott’s π or Krippendorff's α, if ever?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this