TY - JOUR
T1 - When Less Is More
T2 - How Mindset Influences Consumers’ Responses to Products with Reduced Negative Attributes
AU - Wong, Vincent Chi
AU - Su, Lei
AU - Lam, Howard Pong Yuen
N1 - The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support forthe research, authorship, and/orpublication of this article: Thisresearch is supported by a Hong Kong SAR Research Grant (GRF:HKBU12522916) awarded to the second author.
PY - 2020/9/1
Y1 - 2020/9/1
N2 - Marketing communications often describe a reduction in a product’s negative attributes (e.g., “our mineral water now uses 34% less plastic”). This claim may be interpreted as a trend of improving relative to previous state. However, such a claim may also call attention to a negative product feature that might have otherwise been overlooked. The authors suggest that whether consumers are positively or negatively influenced by such claims depends on whether the claims are interpreted through an incremental or entity mindset. When a reduction in negative attributes is viewed through an incremental mindset—the tendency to think of attributes as malleable—a trend-based interpretation results in improved product evaluations. In contrast, an entity mindset that emphasizes attributes are unlikely to change produces a negative effect for the claim. Four experiments and a field survey (N = 2,543) across food, pharmaceuticals, and plastic bottle products confirm the effects and indicate that the effects diminish when consumers believe the attribute is easy to eliminate or when the attribute has extremely threatening consequences. The opposite is observed for claims of reduced positive attributes, such that an entity mindset produces more positive evaluations. The findings offer marketers consumer insights to guide the communication of negatively framed attributes.
AB - Marketing communications often describe a reduction in a product’s negative attributes (e.g., “our mineral water now uses 34% less plastic”). This claim may be interpreted as a trend of improving relative to previous state. However, such a claim may also call attention to a negative product feature that might have otherwise been overlooked. The authors suggest that whether consumers are positively or negatively influenced by such claims depends on whether the claims are interpreted through an incremental or entity mindset. When a reduction in negative attributes is viewed through an incremental mindset—the tendency to think of attributes as malleable—a trend-based interpretation results in improved product evaluations. In contrast, an entity mindset that emphasizes attributes are unlikely to change produces a negative effect for the claim. Four experiments and a field survey (N = 2,543) across food, pharmaceuticals, and plastic bottle products confirm the effects and indicate that the effects diminish when consumers believe the attribute is easy to eliminate or when the attribute has extremely threatening consequences. The opposite is observed for claims of reduced positive attributes, such that an entity mindset produces more positive evaluations. The findings offer marketers consumer insights to guide the communication of negatively framed attributes.
KW - attribute framing
KW - incremental versus entity mindset
KW - marketing communications
KW - reduced negative attribute
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85084858421&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/0022242920920859
DO - 10.1177/0022242920920859
M3 - Journal article
AN - SCOPUS:85084858421
SN - 0022-2429
VL - 84
SP - 137
EP - 153
JO - Journal of Marketing
JF - Journal of Marketing
IS - 5
ER -