What your computer still can't know: A refutation of Bringsjord's refutation of searle's refutation of Bostrom and Floridi

Ahti Veikko Pietarinen

doi:10.3233/978-1-61499-708-5-280

What your computer still can't know: A refutation of Bringsjord's refutation of searle's refutation of Bostrom and Floridi

Ahti Veikko Pietarinen^*

^*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Chapter in book/report/conference proceeding › Conference proceeding › peer-review

Abstract

I refute Bringsjord's attempted refutation of Searle, who has argued against two recent visions: Bostrom's super-intelligence (post-humanism) and Floridi's info-spheres (information revolution). My refutation derives from the impossibility of Turing machines to compute consequential information not linked with observations of its output. Placing post-humanism and information revolution under a philosophical perspective leads to an identification of an unspoken presupposition in both: universalism of meaning. A philosophical theory of information needs a semiotic theory of signs and representations that take information to be a property of signs that are linked with their interpreting minds.

Original language	English
Title of host publication	What Social Robots Can and Should Do
Subtitle of host publication	Proceedings of Robophilosophy 2016/TRANSOR 2016
Editors	Johanna Seibt, Marco Nørskov, Søren Schack Andersen
Publisher	IOS Press
Pages	280-290
Number of pages	11
ISBN (Electronic)	9781614997085
ISBN (Print)	9781614997078
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-708-5-280
Publication status	Published - Oct 2016
Event	CFP Robophilosophy 2016/Research Network for Transdisciplinary Studies in Social Robotics, TRANSOR 2016 - Aarhus, Denmark Duration: 17 Oct 2016 → 21 Oct 2016 https://ebooks.iospress.nl/volume/what-social-robots-can-and-should-do-proceedings-of-robophilosophy-2016-transor-2016

Publication series

Name	Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications
Volume	290
ISSN (Print)	0922-6389

Conference

Conference	CFP Robophilosophy 2016/Research Network for Transdisciplinary Studies in Social Robotics, TRANSOR 2016
Country/Territory	Denmark
City	Aarhus
Period	17/10/16 → 21/10/16
Internet address	https://ebooks.iospress.nl/volume/what-social-robots-can-and-should-do-proceedings-of-robophilosophy-2016-transor-2016

Scopus Subject Areas

Artificial Intelligence

User-Defined Keywords

Info-spheres
Information revolution
Philosophy of information
Philosophy of mind
Philosophy of signs
Post-humanism
Searle
Super-intelligence

Access to Document

10.3233/978-1-61499-708-5-280

Cite this

Pietarinen, A. V. (2016). What your computer still can't know: A refutation of Bringsjord's refutation of searle's refutation of Bostrom and Floridi. In J. Seibt, M. Nørskov, & S. S. Andersen (Eds.), What Social Robots Can and Should Do: Proceedings of Robophilosophy 2016/TRANSOR 2016 (pp. 280-290). (Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications; Vol. 290). IOS Press. https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-708-5-280

Pietarinen, Ahti Veikko. / What your computer still can't know : A refutation of Bringsjord's refutation of searle's refutation of Bostrom and Floridi. What Social Robots Can and Should Do: Proceedings of Robophilosophy 2016/TRANSOR 2016. editor / Johanna Seibt ; Marco Nørskov ; Søren Schack Andersen. IOS Press, 2016. pp. 280-290 (Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications).

@inproceedings{20779520b20e488595cad29f652643d9,

title = "What your computer still can't know: A refutation of Bringsjord's refutation of searle's refutation of Bostrom and Floridi",

abstract = "I refute Bringsjord's attempted refutation of Searle, who has argued against two recent visions: Bostrom's super-intelligence (post-humanism) and Floridi's info-spheres (information revolution). My refutation derives from the impossibility of Turing machines to compute consequential information not linked with observations of its output. Placing post-humanism and information revolution under a philosophical perspective leads to an identification of an unspoken presupposition in both: universalism of meaning. A philosophical theory of information needs a semiotic theory of signs and representations that take information to be a property of signs that are linked with their interpreting minds.",

keywords = "Info-spheres, Information revolution, Philosophy of information, Philosophy of mind, Philosophy of signs, Post-humanism, Searle, Super-intelligence",

author = "Pietarinen, {Ahti Veikko}",

note = "Funding Information: Supported by the Estonian Research Council and the Academy of Finland (Projects DiaMind PUT267 & Abduction PUT1305; DiaMind 1207355, Principal Investigator A.-V. Pietarinen): Diagrammatic Mind: Logical and Communicative Aspects of Iconicity (DiaMind), and Abduction in the Age of Fundamental Uncertainty. Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2016 The authors and IOS Press. All rights reserved.; CFP Robophilosophy 2016/Research Network for Transdisciplinary Studies in Social Robotics, TRANSOR 2016 ; Conference date: 17-10-2016 Through 21-10-2016",

year = "2016",

month = oct,

doi = "10.3233/978-1-61499-708-5-280",

language = "English",

isbn = "9781614997078",

series = "Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications",

publisher = "IOS Press",

pages = "280--290",

editor = "Johanna Seibt and Marco N{\o}rskov and Andersen, {S{\o}ren Schack}",

booktitle = "What Social Robots Can and Should Do",

address = "Netherlands",

url = "https://ebooks.iospress.nl/volume/what-social-robots-can-and-should-do-proceedings-of-robophilosophy-2016-transor-2016",

}

Pietarinen, AV 2016, What your computer still can't know: A refutation of Bringsjord's refutation of searle's refutation of Bostrom and Floridi. in J Seibt, M Nørskov & SS Andersen (eds), What Social Robots Can and Should Do: Proceedings of Robophilosophy 2016/TRANSOR 2016. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, vol. 290, IOS Press, pp. 280-290, CFP Robophilosophy 2016/Research Network for Transdisciplinary Studies in Social Robotics, TRANSOR 2016, Aarhus, Denmark, 17/10/16. https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-708-5-280

What your computer still can't know: A refutation of Bringsjord's refutation of searle's refutation of Bostrom and Floridi. / Pietarinen, Ahti Veikko.
What Social Robots Can and Should Do: Proceedings of Robophilosophy 2016/TRANSOR 2016. ed. / Johanna Seibt; Marco Nørskov; Søren Schack Andersen. IOS Press, 2016. p. 280-290 (Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications; Vol. 290).

Research output: Chapter in book/report/conference proceeding › Conference proceeding › peer-review

TY - GEN

T1 - What your computer still can't know

T2 - CFP Robophilosophy 2016/Research Network for Transdisciplinary Studies in Social Robotics, TRANSOR 2016

AU - Pietarinen, Ahti Veikko

N1 - Funding Information: Supported by the Estonian Research Council and the Academy of Finland (Projects DiaMind PUT267 & Abduction PUT1305; DiaMind 1207355, Principal Investigator A.-V. Pietarinen): Diagrammatic Mind: Logical and Communicative Aspects of Iconicity (DiaMind), and Abduction in the Age of Fundamental Uncertainty. Publisher Copyright: © 2016 The authors and IOS Press. All rights reserved.

PY - 2016/10

Y1 - 2016/10

N2 - I refute Bringsjord's attempted refutation of Searle, who has argued against two recent visions: Bostrom's super-intelligence (post-humanism) and Floridi's info-spheres (information revolution). My refutation derives from the impossibility of Turing machines to compute consequential information not linked with observations of its output. Placing post-humanism and information revolution under a philosophical perspective leads to an identification of an unspoken presupposition in both: universalism of meaning. A philosophical theory of information needs a semiotic theory of signs and representations that take information to be a property of signs that are linked with their interpreting minds.

AB - I refute Bringsjord's attempted refutation of Searle, who has argued against two recent visions: Bostrom's super-intelligence (post-humanism) and Floridi's info-spheres (information revolution). My refutation derives from the impossibility of Turing machines to compute consequential information not linked with observations of its output. Placing post-humanism and information revolution under a philosophical perspective leads to an identification of an unspoken presupposition in both: universalism of meaning. A philosophical theory of information needs a semiotic theory of signs and representations that take information to be a property of signs that are linked with their interpreting minds.

KW - Info-spheres

KW - Information revolution

KW - Philosophy of information

KW - Philosophy of mind

KW - Philosophy of signs

KW - Post-humanism

KW - Searle

KW - Super-intelligence

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84992549237&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3233/978-1-61499-708-5-280

DO - 10.3233/978-1-61499-708-5-280

M3 - Conference proceeding

AN - SCOPUS:84992549237

SN - 9781614997078

T3 - Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications

SP - 280

EP - 290

BT - What Social Robots Can and Should Do

A2 - Seibt, Johanna

A2 - Nørskov, Marco

A2 - Andersen, Søren Schack

PB - IOS Press

Y2 - 17 October 2016 through 21 October 2016

ER -

Pietarinen AV. What your computer still can't know: A refutation of Bringsjord's refutation of searle's refutation of Bostrom and Floridi. In Seibt J, Nørskov M, Andersen SS, editors, What Social Robots Can and Should Do: Proceedings of Robophilosophy 2016/TRANSOR 2016. IOS Press. 2016. p. 280-290. (Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications). doi: 10.3233/978-1-61499-708-5-280

What your computer still can't know: A refutation of Bringsjord's refutation of searle's refutation of Bostrom and Floridi

Abstract

Publication series

Conference

Scopus Subject Areas

User-Defined Keywords

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this