What should we share? Understanding the aim of intercultural information ethics

Pak-Hang Wong*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal article

Abstract

The aim of Intercultural Information Ethics (IIE), as Ess aptly puts, is to "(a) address both local and global issues evoked by ICTs / CMC, etc., (b) in a ways that both sustain local traditions / values / preference, etc. and (c) provide shared, (quasi-) universal responses to central ethical problems? (Ess 2007a, 102). This formulation of the aim of IIE, however, is not unambiguous. In this paper, I will discuss two different understandings of the aim of IIE, one of which advocates "shared norms, different interpretations" and another proposes "shared norms, different justifications". I shall argue that the first understanding is untenable, and the second understanding is acceptable only with qualification. Finally, I shall briefly suggest an alternative way to understand the aim of IIE.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)50-58
Number of pages9
JournalACM SIGCAS Computers and Society
Volume39
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2009

User-Defined Keywords

  • Intercultural Information Ethics
  • pragmatic arguments
  • pluralism
  • relativism
  • objectivism
  • value-based ethics

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'What should we share? Understanding the aim of intercultural information ethics'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this