Abstract
The aim of Intercultural Information Ethics (IIE), as Ess aptly puts, is to "(a) address both local and global issues evoked by ICTs / CMC, etc., (b) in a ways that both sustain local traditions / values / preference, etc. and (c) provide shared, (quasi-) universal responses to central ethical problems? (Ess 2007a, 102). This formulation of the aim of IIE, however, is not unambiguous. In this paper, I will discuss two different understandings of the aim of IIE, one of which advocates "shared norms, different interpretations" and another proposes "shared norms, different justifications". I shall argue that the first understanding is untenable, and the second understanding is acceptable only with qualification. Finally, I shall briefly suggest an alternative way to understand the aim of IIE.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 50-58 |
Number of pages | 9 |
Journal | ACM SIGCAS Computers and Society |
Volume | 39 |
Issue number | 3 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 1 Dec 2009 |
User-Defined Keywords
- Intercultural Information Ethics
- pragmatic arguments
- pluralism
- relativism
- objectivism
- value-based ethics