What does genetic research tell us about the origins of language and literacy development? A reflection on Verhoef et al. (2020)

Bonnie Wing Yin Chow*, Simpson W.L. Wong

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

    1 Citation (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Quantitative genetic research has set the stage for the exploration of genetic influences and the underlying mechanisms that undergird language and literacy development. Following this line of enquiry, Verhoef et al. (2020) address a critical issue related to genetic processes by comparing whether the genetic mechanism known as innovation or amplification plays a more pivotal role in literacy development during the period of early childhood to early adolescence, using the cutting-edge technique called the genome-wide complex trait analysis. This commentary reviews and discusses the implications of the provocative findings that stem from their study and offers concrete directions for future research. Embedded in our reflections are discussions related to the generalist genes vs genetic specificity debate, language universality vs specificity, as well as the role of environment in genetic influences. Taken together, the discussions in the commentary have highlighted the need for more in-depth explorations of the interplay between genes and literacy development through a multi-disciplinary approach.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)739-741
    Number of pages3
    JournalJournal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines
    Volume62
    Issue number6
    Early online date25 Feb 2021
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Jun 2021

    Scopus Subject Areas

    • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
    • Developmental and Educational Psychology
    • Psychiatry and Mental health

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'What does genetic research tell us about the origins of language and literacy development? A reflection on Verhoef et al. (2020)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this