TY - JOUR
T1 - Web-based essay critiquing system and EFL students' writing
T2 - A quantitative and qualitative investigation
AU - LEE, Cynthia F K
AU - WONG, Kelvin C K
AU - CHEUNG, Kwok Wai
AU - LEE, Sau Ling
N1 - Copyright:
Copyright 2009 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2009/2
Y1 - 2009/2
N2 - The paper first describes a web-based essay critiquing system developed by the authors using latent semantic analysis (LSA), an automatic text analysis technique, to provide students with immediate feedback on content and organisation for revision whenever there is an internet connection. It reports on its effectiveness in enhancing adult EFL students' writing quantitatively and qualitatively. Finally it suggests ways to use the system effectively. An experimental study was conducted. Twenty-seven student writers, who were assigned to the control and experimental groups randomly, wrote a 300-word argumentative essay, a genre usually tested in local and public examinations, over an 80-minute duration. The experimental group received two modes of feedback from the system whereas the control group typed and revised their essays on the computer in the traditional pen and paper way only. Their final submissions were co-marked by two raters, and comparison on essay length and final scores between the two groups was made. Although it was found that there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in these two aspects, the experimental group's writing strategies shed some light on pedagogy.
AB - The paper first describes a web-based essay critiquing system developed by the authors using latent semantic analysis (LSA), an automatic text analysis technique, to provide students with immediate feedback on content and organisation for revision whenever there is an internet connection. It reports on its effectiveness in enhancing adult EFL students' writing quantitatively and qualitatively. Finally it suggests ways to use the system effectively. An experimental study was conducted. Twenty-seven student writers, who were assigned to the control and experimental groups randomly, wrote a 300-word argumentative essay, a genre usually tested in local and public examinations, over an 80-minute duration. The experimental group received two modes of feedback from the system whereas the control group typed and revised their essays on the computer in the traditional pen and paper way only. Their final submissions were co-marked by two raters, and comparison on essay length and final scores between the two groups was made. Although it was found that there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in these two aspects, the experimental group's writing strategies shed some light on pedagogy.
KW - Adult learners
KW - Essay critiquing
KW - Latent semantic analysis (LSA)
KW - Second language writing
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=60649110444&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/09588220802613807
DO - 10.1080/09588220802613807
M3 - Journal article
AN - SCOPUS:60649110444
SN - 0958-8221
VL - 22
SP - 57
EP - 72
JO - Computer Assisted Language Learning
JF - Computer Assisted Language Learning
IS - 1
ER -