Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Visioning a two-level human–machine communication framework: Initiating conversations between explainable AI and communication

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Amid mounting interest in artificial intelligence (AI) technology, communication scholars have sought to understand humans’ perceptions of and attitudes toward AI’s predictions, recommendations, and decisions. Meanwhile, scholars in the nascent but growing field of explainable AI (XAI) have aimed to clarify AI’s operational mechanisms and make them interpretable, visible, and transparent. In this conceptual article, we suggest that a conversation between human–machine communication (HMC) and XAI is advantageous and necessary. Following the introduction of these two areas, we demonstrate how research on XAI can inform the HMC scholarship regarding the human-in-the-loop approach and the message production explainability. Next, we expound upon how communication scholars’ focuses on message sources, receivers, features, and effects can reciprocally benefit XAI research. At its core, this article proposes a two-level HMC framework and posits that bridging the two fields can guide future AI research and development.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)216-229
Number of pages14
JournalCommunication Theory
Volume34
Issue number4
Early online date30 Jul 2024
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 2024

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 9 - Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure
    SDG 9 Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure

User-Defined Keywords

  • artificial intelligence
  • explainable AI
  • human-in-the-loop approach
  • human–AI interaction
  • human–machine communication

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Visioning a two-level human–machine communication framework: Initiating conversations between explainable AI and communication'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this