Abstract
Today, more than ever, consideration of politics requires reflection on the role of violence and the ethical conduct of leaders. These and associated issues are central in Weber’s ‘Politics as a vocation’, published 100 years ago. While frequently cited, Weber’s definitions of politics and the state, and his understanding of the vocation of politics, are seldom subject to close examination. In the present article Weber’s treatment of the state and politics in terms of the means of violence is shown to be inadequate and misleading. The extra-territoriality of the modern state, necessary in war-making and international intrigue, is continuous with its means of violence, but curiously ignored in ‘Politics as a vocation’. Finally, Weber’s account of morality in the political vocation is shown to have high polemical resonance but low analytic value.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 56-70 |
| Number of pages | 15 |
| Journal | Sociology |
| Volume | 55 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| Early online date | 10 Jan 2020 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Feb 2021 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
User-Defined Keywords
- extra-territoriality
- political morality
- state/politics distinction
- taxation
- vocation
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Violence and Politics: Reconsidering Weber’s ‘Politics as a Vocation’'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver