Abstract
Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) tools are increasingly being used to support written feedback practices for student writers. However, access to these tools may be restricted in certain contexts. The development and release of DeepSeek provide users with a different user experience through explicitly articulating the reasoning process behind its responses, which could potentially affect how diverse writers engage with it in their written feedback practices. In this review, we describe the key features of DeepSeek, contrast it with other GenAI tools, and explore its potential benefits and limitations for supporting student writers’ feedback practices. We also discuss ethical and practical implications, as well as future directions for using DeepSeek in writing assessment, instruction, and research.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 101077 |
| Number of pages | 8 |
| Journal | Assessing Writing |
| Volume | 69 |
| Early online date | 2 Jun 2026 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Jul 2026 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 4 Quality Education
User-Defined Keywords
- DeepSeek
- Feedback
- Generative AI
- Writing assessment
- Writing instruction
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Using DeepSeek's reasoning-based AI model to support written feedback practices'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver