Abstract
Rather than weakening regime theory, comparative analysis illuminates its central theoretical insights. The cases of Leeds (United Kingdom) and Lille (France) show cities in contrasting geographical, cultural, and institutional contexts developing regimelike local polities through business participation in a wide range of public-sector decisions. The five special noninstitutional factors promoting regimes are local business ownership, business integration, large metropolitan context, and economic advantage or disadvantage. The distinctiveness of these cities in their countries is an indication of the degree of policy learning and capacity generation that has taken place.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 382-404 |
| Number of pages | 23 |
| Journal | Urban Affairs Review |
| Volume | 33 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Jan 1998 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 11 Sustainable Cities and Communities
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Urban regimes and local governance in Britain and France: Policy adaption and coordination in Leeds and Lille'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver