Unequal Regionalism: Regional Planning in China and England

Him CHUNG*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper responds to the revival of regionalism in the past two decades by showing that such a re-emergence is unequal. Comparing the practice of regional planning in China and England, this paper has demonstrated that the party-state in China and the liberal-democratic state in England have responded differently to this revival and developed different framework for regional administration and planning. These variations have not only elaborated planners' concern about planning practice in a ‘context of difference’ from social dimension to geographical variations, but also echoed geographers' affirmation that global trends take on different characters in local setting.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)570-586
Number of pages17
JournalPlanning Practice and Research
Volume30
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 20 Oct 2015

Scopus Subject Areas

  • Geography, Planning and Development

User-Defined Keywords

  • China
  • England
  • regional governance
  • spatial planning

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Unequal Regionalism: Regional Planning in China and England'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this