TY - JOUR
T1 - Uncertainty assessment of GlobeLand30 Land cover data set over central Asia
AU - Sun, Bo
AU - Chen, Xi
AU - Zhou, Qiming
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors would like to thank Dr. Jun Liu for assisting in data collection and arrangement. The research is supported by the International Science & Technology Cooperation Program of China (2010DFA92720-24), Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) General Research Grant (41471340), Research Grants Council (RGC) of Hong Kong General Research Fund (GRF) (HKBU 203913), Hong Kong Baptist University Faculty Research Grant (FRG1/14-15/073), Shenzhen Basic Research Project (JCYJ20150630114942312), and Shenzhen Science and Technology Research and Development Fund (GJHS20131212164846757). The GlobeLand30 data set is provided by the National Geomatics Center of China. (DOI:10.11769/GlobeLand30.2010.db).
PY - 2016/7
Y1 - 2016/7
N2 - GlobeLand30, the world's first 30m-resolution global land cover data set, has recently been issued for research on global change at a fine resolution. Given the accuracy of GlobeLand30 data may show significant variation in different parts of the world and data quality at continental scale has not been validated yet, this study aims to evaluate the uncertainty of the data over Central Asia. Since it is difficult to get long-term historical ground references, GlobeLand30 data at the most recent epoch (i.e., GlobeLand30-2010) was assessed. In the test, a large sample size was adopted, and more than 25 thousand samples were selected by a random sampling scheme and interpreted manually as ground references based on higher resolution imagery at the same epoch, such as images from ZY-3 (China Resources Series) satellite and Google earth. Cross validation of image interpretation by three well-trained interpreters was adopted to make the references more reliable. Error matrix and Kappa coefficient were utilized to quantify data accuracies in terms of classification accuracy. Results show that the GlobeLand30-2010 data presents an overall accuracy of 46% in the study area. As for specific land cover types, bare land illustrates a high user's accuracy but a lower producer's accuracy. At the same time, the accuracies of grassland and forest are significantly lower than other types. The majority of misclassification types come from bare land. It implies a difficulty of distinguishing grassland or forest from bare land in the study area. In addition, the confusion between shrub land and grassland also results in the misclassification. The results serve as a useful reference of data accuracy for further analysis of land cover change in Central Asia as well as the applications of GlobeLand30 data at a regional or continental scale.
AB - GlobeLand30, the world's first 30m-resolution global land cover data set, has recently been issued for research on global change at a fine resolution. Given the accuracy of GlobeLand30 data may show significant variation in different parts of the world and data quality at continental scale has not been validated yet, this study aims to evaluate the uncertainty of the data over Central Asia. Since it is difficult to get long-term historical ground references, GlobeLand30 data at the most recent epoch (i.e., GlobeLand30-2010) was assessed. In the test, a large sample size was adopted, and more than 25 thousand samples were selected by a random sampling scheme and interpreted manually as ground references based on higher resolution imagery at the same epoch, such as images from ZY-3 (China Resources Series) satellite and Google earth. Cross validation of image interpretation by three well-trained interpreters was adopted to make the references more reliable. Error matrix and Kappa coefficient were utilized to quantify data accuracies in terms of classification accuracy. Results show that the GlobeLand30-2010 data presents an overall accuracy of 46% in the study area. As for specific land cover types, bare land illustrates a high user's accuracy but a lower producer's accuracy. At the same time, the accuracies of grassland and forest are significantly lower than other types. The majority of misclassification types come from bare land. It implies a difficulty of distinguishing grassland or forest from bare land in the study area. In addition, the confusion between shrub land and grassland also results in the misclassification. The results serve as a useful reference of data accuracy for further analysis of land cover change in Central Asia as well as the applications of GlobeLand30 data at a regional or continental scale.
KW - Accuracy
KW - Central Asia
KW - GlobeLand30
KW - Land cover
KW - Remote sensing
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84979573849&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.5194/isprs-archives-XLI-B8-1313-2016
DO - 10.5194/isprs-archives-XLI-B8-1313-2016
M3 - Conference article
AN - SCOPUS:84979573849
SN - 1682-1750
VL - XLI-B8
SP - 1313
EP - 1317
JO - International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences - ISPRS Archives
JF - International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences - ISPRS Archives
T2 - 23rd International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences Congress, ISPRS 2016
Y2 - 12 July 2016 through 19 July 2016
ER -