TY - JOUR
T1 - Traffic safety perception, attitude, and feeder mode choice of metro commute
T2 - Evidence from Shenzhen
AU - Guo, Yuanyuan
AU - Yang, Linchuan
AU - Huang, Wenke
AU - Guo, Yi
N1 - Funding Information:
This study is sponsored by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51778530).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
PY - 2020/12/2
Y1 - 2020/12/2
N2 - Like many other transit modes, the metro provides stop-to-stop services rather than door-to-door services, so its use undeniably involves first-and last-mile issues. Understanding the determinants of the first-and last-mile mode choice is essential. Existing literature, however, mostly overlooks the mode choice effects of traffic safety perception and attitudes toward the mode. To this end, based on a face-to-face questionnaire survey in Shenzhen, China, this study uses the two-sample t-test to confirm the systematic differences in traffic safety perception and attitudes between different subgroups and develops a series of multinomial logistic (MNL) models to identify the determinants of first-and last-mile mode choice for metro commuters. The results of this study show that: (1) Walking is the most frequently used travel mode, followed by dockless bike-sharing (DBS) and buses; (2) Variances in traffic safety perception and attitude exist across gender and location; (3) Vehicle-related crash risks discourage metro commuters from walking to/from the metro station but encourage them to use DBS and buses as feeder modes; (4) DBS–metro integration is encouraged by the attitude that DBS is quicker than buses and walking, and positive attitudes toward the bus and DBS availability are decisive for the bus–metro and DBS–metro integration, respectively; and (5) Substantial differences exist in the mode choice effects of traffic safety perception and attitudes for access and egress trips. This study provides a valuable reference for metro commuters’ first-and last-mile travel mode choice, contributing to developing a sustainable urban transport system.
AB - Like many other transit modes, the metro provides stop-to-stop services rather than door-to-door services, so its use undeniably involves first-and last-mile issues. Understanding the determinants of the first-and last-mile mode choice is essential. Existing literature, however, mostly overlooks the mode choice effects of traffic safety perception and attitudes toward the mode. To this end, based on a face-to-face questionnaire survey in Shenzhen, China, this study uses the two-sample t-test to confirm the systematic differences in traffic safety perception and attitudes between different subgroups and develops a series of multinomial logistic (MNL) models to identify the determinants of first-and last-mile mode choice for metro commuters. The results of this study show that: (1) Walking is the most frequently used travel mode, followed by dockless bike-sharing (DBS) and buses; (2) Variances in traffic safety perception and attitude exist across gender and location; (3) Vehicle-related crash risks discourage metro commuters from walking to/from the metro station but encourage them to use DBS and buses as feeder modes; (4) DBS–metro integration is encouraged by the attitude that DBS is quicker than buses and walking, and positive attitudes toward the bus and DBS availability are decisive for the bus–metro and DBS–metro integration, respectively; and (5) Substantial differences exist in the mode choice effects of traffic safety perception and attitudes for access and egress trips. This study provides a valuable reference for metro commuters’ first-and last-mile travel mode choice, contributing to developing a sustainable urban transport system.
KW - Attitude
KW - China
KW - Dockless bike-sharing
KW - Last mile
KW - Multinomial logistic
KW - Objective factor
KW - Perception
KW - Shenzhen
KW - Subjective factor
KW - Traffic safety
KW - Vehicle-related crash
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85097937461&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3390/ijerph17249402
DO - 10.3390/ijerph17249402
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 33333965
AN - SCOPUS:85097937461
SN - 1661-7827
VL - 17
JO - International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
JF - International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
IS - 24
M1 - 9402
ER -