Too-explicit cultural policy: Rethinking cultural and creative industry policies in Hong Kong

Louis Ho*

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Chapter in book/report/conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

    Abstract

    This chapter presents a study of the articulation and implementation of Hong Kong’s cultural and creative industries policies. Since the 1990s, the development of Hong Kong’s economy has been dictated by the goal of becoming an international financial hub. The government claimed that it would take a laissez-faire approach and uphold a capitalistic free market. In recent years, various governments and academic institutes have grown increasingly concerned about the development of creative industries. This was mainly attributable to the decline of traditional economic industries, while the economic value of “culture and creativity” gained recognition - giving rise to the idea that symbolic value is more profitable than physical value. In Hong Kong, cultural and creative industry policies are mainly industry policies, and the implementation of such policies leans towards production and industry structure. It is generally agreed that the concept of “creative industry” began to have an impact on government policy and academic research after 1997.

    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationThe Routledge Handbook of Global Cultural Policy
    EditorsVictoria Durrer, Toby Miller, Dave O'Brien
    PublisherTaylor and Francis
    Chapter23
    Pages355-364
    Number of pages10
    Edition1
    ISBN (Electronic)9781315718408
    ISBN (Print)9781138857827
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2018

    Publication series

    NameThe Routledge International Handbook Series
    PublisherRoutledge Taylor & Francis Group

    Scopus Subject Areas

    • Economics, Econometrics and Finance(all)
    • General Business,Management and Accounting

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Too-explicit cultural policy: Rethinking cultural and creative industry policies in Hong Kong'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this