To tell the truth on Kant and Christianity: Will the real affirmative interpreter please stand up!

Stephen R PALMQUIST*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

After reviewing the history of the "affirmative" approach to interpreting Kant's Religion, I offer four responses to the symposium papers in the previous issue of Faith and Philosophy. First, incorrectly identifying Kant's two "experiments" leads to misunderstandings of his affirmation of Christianity. Second, Kant's Critical Religion expounds a thoroughgoing interpretation of these experiments, and was not primarily an attempt to confirm the architectonic introduced in Kant's System of Perspectives. Third, the surprise positions defended by most symposium contributors render the "affirmative" label virtually meaningless. Finally, if Kant is read as constructing perspectival philosophy, not theology, the compatibility of his positions with Christianity stands.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)340-346
Number of pages7
JournalFaith and Philosophy
Volume29
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012

Scopus Subject Areas

  • Religious studies
  • Philosophy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'To tell the truth on Kant and Christianity: Will the real affirmative interpreter please stand up!'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this