Abstract
This study investigates the Sino-US difference in the journalistic practice of providing on-air attribution for those interviewed in television news. Through a content analysis, this study compares how CBS News, a premier US TV network, and CCTV, China's most watched network, attributed their interviewees with onscreen name credits (names, titles and affiliations). The findings show that US journalists were more likely to provide on-screen name credits than their Chinese colleagues who, in turn, were more likely to give credits to interviewees who were older, male and government officials. This study should contribute to a better understanding of how cultural values and political ideologies may affect the way interviewees are treated in television news.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 202-216 |
| Number of pages | 15 |
| Journal | Asian Journal of Communication |
| Volume | 21 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Apr 2011 |
User-Defined Keywords
- Cultural difference
- Ideology
- Name credit
- News source
- On-air attribution
- TV news
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'To name or not to name: A cross-cultural comparison of on-air attribution in US and Chinese TV news'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver