Abstract
The mobility and agency of the unemployed have rarely been examined together in welfare administration. Mobility research has much to offer the (im)mobility of low-skilled and unemployed workers. The article begins by critically examining dominant public discourse and policy reforms that stigmatise the assumed immobility of the unemployed. Drawing on empirical data from in-depth interviews with people on income support payments in Australia, it then offers a critical view on the mobility decision-making processes of these job-seekers. Building on previous research concerning the politics of mobility, it shows that structural inequalities impact mobility choices, making relocation difficult for many job-seekers. At the same time, it highlights the localised mobility that job search now involves, complicating orthodox associations between mobility and power–as well as assumptions that job-seekers are immobile.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 596-611 |
| Number of pages | 16 |
| Journal | Mobilities |
| Volume | 14 |
| Issue number | 5 |
| Early online date | 17 Jul 2019 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Sept 2019 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 8 Decent Work and Economic Growth
User-Defined Keywords
- Mobility
- immobility
- unemployment
- Australia
- income support
- welfare conditionality
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'To move or not to move: mobility decision-making in the context of welfare conditionality and paid employment'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver