Abstract
Building on recent advancements in moral disengagement theory and shared reality theory, we propose that employees do not need to directly experience frequent customer mistreatment to trigger their moral disengagement. Specifically, when employees frequently share their mistreatment experiences with coworkers, even infrequent instances of customer mistreatment can evoke heightened levels of moral disengagement. Conversely, when social sharing occurs less frequently, infrequent instances of customer mistreatment are associated with lower levels of moral disengagement, while more frequent customer mistreatment is linked to higher levels of moral disengagement, which then positively relates to service sabotage, indicating a positive indirect effect of the frequency of customer mistreatment on service sabotage through moral disengagement. Results from two independent time-lagged studies involving samples of call center employees (Sample 1 of Study 1), casino cage cashiers (Sample 2 of Study 1), and service representatives (Study 2) recruited from an online research platform, lend support to our propositions.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 889-914 |
| Number of pages | 26 |
| Journal | Management and Organization Review |
| Volume | 21 |
| Issue number | 5 |
| Early online date | 10 Sept 2025 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Oct 2025 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 8 Decent Work and Economic Growth
User-Defined Keywords
- customer mistreatment
- moral disengagement
- service sabotage
- shared reality theory
- social sharing
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Things We Do, Costs We Yet Don’t Know: Social Sharing as a Catalyst of Service Sabotage'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver