TY - JOUR
T1 - The virtue of a controlling leadership style
T2 - Authoritarian leadership, work stressors, and leader power distance orientation
AU - Chen, Leni
AU - Huang, Xu
AU - Sun, Jianmin
AU - Zheng, Yuyan
AU - Graham, Les
AU - Jiang, Judy
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
PY - 2024/6
Y1 - 2024/6
N2 - We developed and tested a theoretical model showing that authoritarian leadership has both positive and negative influences on employees’ work performance. We posited that authoritarian leadership may shape both challenge stressors and hindrance stressors, which compel and undermine in-role and extra-role performance, respectively. We found consistent results across two studies. In Study 1, our results from two samples in different cultures showed that authoritarian leadership was positively related to objective performance (Sample 1: n = 402 Chinese chain restaurant managers) and extra-role performance (Sample 2: n = 369 U.K. police officers) via challenge stressors. Authoritarian leadership was negatively related to objective performance and extra-role performance via hindrance stressors. In Study 2 (n = 195 Chinese power industry employees), we replicated the findings of Study 1. Further, we found that authoritarian leadership behaviors among leaders who scored low on power distance orientation were not negatively related to in-role and extra-role performance via hindrance stressors.
AB - We developed and tested a theoretical model showing that authoritarian leadership has both positive and negative influences on employees’ work performance. We posited that authoritarian leadership may shape both challenge stressors and hindrance stressors, which compel and undermine in-role and extra-role performance, respectively. We found consistent results across two studies. In Study 1, our results from two samples in different cultures showed that authoritarian leadership was positively related to objective performance (Sample 1: n = 402 Chinese chain restaurant managers) and extra-role performance (Sample 2: n = 369 U.K. police officers) via challenge stressors. Authoritarian leadership was negatively related to objective performance and extra-role performance via hindrance stressors. In Study 2 (n = 195 Chinese power industry employees), we replicated the findings of Study 1. Further, we found that authoritarian leadership behaviors among leaders who scored low on power distance orientation were not negatively related to in-role and extra-role performance via hindrance stressors.
KW - Authoritarian leadership
KW - Challenge/hindrance stressor framework
KW - Leader power distance orientation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85142287322&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s10490-022-09860-7
DO - 10.1007/s10490-022-09860-7
M3 - Journal article
AN - SCOPUS:85142287322
SN - 0217-4561
VL - 41
SP - 507
EP - 547
JO - Asia Pacific Journal of Management
JF - Asia Pacific Journal of Management
IS - 2
ER -