The translatorial middle between direct and indirect reports

Douglas ROBINSON*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Chapter in book/report/conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

Abstract

The article begins with the previously observed fact that there is a shifting middle ground between direct and indirect reports, in order to argue that that middle ground is occupied and complicated by translation. This case is pursued through a look at translations of four example passages: (1) the problem of translating tonality from Aleksis Kivi’s Finnish fiction; (2) the problem of translating argumentative slippage from Aristotle’s Rhetoric; (3) the problem of translating grammatical gender from Friedrich Schleiermacher; and (4) the problem of translating prosodic features from Volter Kilpi’s Finnish fiction. The conclusion is that our sense of the difference between direct and indirect reports is organized “icotically,” through the power of group normativization/plausibilization.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationPerspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy and Psychology
PublisherSpringer International Publishing
Pages371-400
Number of pages30
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019

Publication series

NamePerspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy and Psychology
Volume19
ISSN (Print)2214-3807
ISSN (Electronic)2214-3815

Scopus Subject Areas

  • Language and Linguistics
  • Philosophy
  • Applied Psychology
  • Linguistics and Language

User-Defined Keywords

  • Directness
  • Explicitation
  • Implicitation
  • Indirectness
  • Interpretation
  • Translation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The translatorial middle between direct and indirect reports'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this