TY - JOUR
T1 - The statecraft of promoting community-wide civic education in Hong Kong
AU - Tse, Thomas Kwan Choi
AU - Lau, Tracy Chui-Shan
N1 - Funding Information:
This research was fully funded by a research grant (CUHK 14410914) from the Research Grants Council of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China. Thanks also go to Ms. Joyce Kwok, and the informants for their kind support for the project, as well as to Dr. Eunice Tang, Ms. Lauren Boydell and Ms. Grace Wu for editing and proofreading the article.
PY - 2021/2
Y1 - 2021/2
N2 - The state plays a vital role in shaping the values and beliefs of ordinary citizens in the realm of civic education. Since the early 1980s, the significant political changes associated with decolonization and retro-cession have transformed the landscape of civic education. Differences over a shared sense of citizenship, and how this should be represented in education, have been prominent in discussions of the Hong Kong community over the years. The task of community civic education in Hong Kong largely rests with the Home Affairs Bureau and its advisory body, CPCE—a committee established in 1986 for advices and implementing activities outside schools in conjunction with the Government and concerned community organizations. However, the Government has attempted to manipulate and steer the Committee’s work through its terms of reference, its organizational restructuring, its activities, its funding support, and the appointment of members. As a result, the Committee has been constrained by its composition, powers, and functions, and these have impaired its role as an advocate for civic education. This article ends with a discussion of the conditions, constraints, and strategies of the state in exercising hegemony.
AB - The state plays a vital role in shaping the values and beliefs of ordinary citizens in the realm of civic education. Since the early 1980s, the significant political changes associated with decolonization and retro-cession have transformed the landscape of civic education. Differences over a shared sense of citizenship, and how this should be represented in education, have been prominent in discussions of the Hong Kong community over the years. The task of community civic education in Hong Kong largely rests with the Home Affairs Bureau and its advisory body, CPCE—a committee established in 1986 for advices and implementing activities outside schools in conjunction with the Government and concerned community organizations. However, the Government has attempted to manipulate and steer the Committee’s work through its terms of reference, its organizational restructuring, its activities, its funding support, and the appointment of members. As a result, the Committee has been constrained by its composition, powers, and functions, and these have impaired its role as an advocate for civic education. This article ends with a discussion of the conditions, constraints, and strategies of the state in exercising hegemony.
UR - https://www.jstor.org/stable/27005560
UR - https://muse.jhu.edu/article/784432#info_wrap
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85102770559&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Journal article
AN - SCOPUS:85102770559
SN - 1680-2012
VL - 21
SP - 195
EP - 223
JO - China Review
JF - China Review
IS - 1
ER -