TY - JOUR
T1 - The Relationship between Governance Networks and Social Networks
T2 - Progress, Problems and Prospects
AU - Ramia, Gaby
AU - Patulny, Roger
AU - Marston, Greg
AU - Cassells, Kyla
N1 - Funding Information:
The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This work was supported by The Australian Research Council LP140100033.
Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2017.
PY - 2018/11
Y1 - 2018/11
N2 - A governance networks literature that uses social network analysis has emerged, but research tends to be more technical than conceptual. This restricts its accessibility and usefulness for non-quantitative scholars and practitioners alike. Furthermore, the literature has not adequately appreciated the importance of informal networking for the effective operation of governance networks. This can hinder inter-disciplinary analysis. Through a critical review, this article identifies four areas of challenge for the governance networks literature and offers four corresponding, complementary sets of concepts from the social network analysis field: (a) the difference between policy networks and governance networks, (b) the role and status of people in governance networks, (c) the ‘dark side’ of networks and the role of power differentials within them and (d) network evaluation and the question of ‘what works’ in network management. The article argues that a less technical, more accessible account of social network analysis offers an additional lens through which to view governance networks.
AB - A governance networks literature that uses social network analysis has emerged, but research tends to be more technical than conceptual. This restricts its accessibility and usefulness for non-quantitative scholars and practitioners alike. Furthermore, the literature has not adequately appreciated the importance of informal networking for the effective operation of governance networks. This can hinder inter-disciplinary analysis. Through a critical review, this article identifies four areas of challenge for the governance networks literature and offers four corresponding, complementary sets of concepts from the social network analysis field: (a) the difference between policy networks and governance networks, (b) the role and status of people in governance networks, (c) the ‘dark side’ of networks and the role of power differentials within them and (d) network evaluation and the question of ‘what works’ in network management. The article argues that a less technical, more accessible account of social network analysis offers an additional lens through which to view governance networks.
KW - governance networks
KW - policy networks
KW - public management networks
KW - social network
KW - social networks analysis
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85045629230&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/1478929917713952
DO - 10.1177/1478929917713952
M3 - Journal article
AN - SCOPUS:85045629230
SN - 1478-9299
VL - 16
SP - 331
EP - 341
JO - Political Studies Review
JF - Political Studies Review
IS - 4
ER -