TY - JOUR
T1 - The relation of gender-role classifications to the prosocial and antisocial behavior of chinese adolescents
AU - MA, Hing Keung
N1 - Funding Information:
Hong Kong Baptist University and the Research Grants Council of the University Grants Committee (Grant RGC/95–96/07), Hong Kong, financially supported this work.
PY - 2005/6
Y1 - 2005/6
N2 - The author investigated the relation between gender-role classifications and prosocial and antisocial behavior for 505 Chinese adolescents in grades 7 to 12. The author found that (a) boys were more antisocial than girls were, (b) there was no significant gender difference in prosocial behavior, (c) prosocial behavior was associated positively with both masculinity and femininity, (d) delinquent behavior was associated positively with masculinity, (e) gender-role classification that was consistent with one's biological gender (e.g., femininity in girls) was more salient in predicting one's prosocial behavior than was a gender-role classification that was not consistent with one's gender (e.g., femininity in boys), (f) delinquent behavior in the feminine group was significantly lower than it was in the other 3 gender-role groups (masculine, androgynous, undifferentiated), and (g) adolescents in the undifferentiated group tended to be less prosocial and fairly antisocial, and their social behavioral pattern was the least favorable among the four gender-role classifications.
AB - The author investigated the relation between gender-role classifications and prosocial and antisocial behavior for 505 Chinese adolescents in grades 7 to 12. The author found that (a) boys were more antisocial than girls were, (b) there was no significant gender difference in prosocial behavior, (c) prosocial behavior was associated positively with both masculinity and femininity, (d) delinquent behavior was associated positively with masculinity, (e) gender-role classification that was consistent with one's biological gender (e.g., femininity in girls) was more salient in predicting one's prosocial behavior than was a gender-role classification that was not consistent with one's gender (e.g., femininity in boys), (f) delinquent behavior in the feminine group was significantly lower than it was in the other 3 gender-role groups (masculine, androgynous, undifferentiated), and (g) adolescents in the undifferentiated group tended to be less prosocial and fairly antisocial, and their social behavioral pattern was the least favorable among the four gender-role classifications.
KW - Antisocial behavior
KW - Gender-role classifications
KW - Prosocial behavior
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=19844374189&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3200/GNTP.166.2.189-202
DO - 10.3200/GNTP.166.2.189-202
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 15906931
AN - SCOPUS:19844374189
SN - 0022-1325
VL - 166
SP - 189
EP - 202
JO - Journal of Genetic Psychology
JF - Journal of Genetic Psychology
IS - 2
ER -