TY - JOUR
T1 - The politics of assembling pilots
T2 - Policy networks and selection strategies in top-down climate experimentation
AU - Yang, Yiqun
AU - Lo, Kevin
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by the General Research Fund (12600718) of the Research Grants Council of Hong Kong.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
PY - 2024/7
Y1 - 2024/7
N2 - Climate experimentation is an influential governance strategy for enacting socio-technical and policy innovations. In this study, we investigated how upper-level governments in China establish policy networks to conduct climate experiments. Using the Near-Zero Carbon Pilot program in Guangdong as a case study, we identified a selection strategy that exhibited a strong preference for pilots with a proven track record in decarbonization. We argue that this strategy was driven by political objectives, including meeting central government agenda and showcasing local successes. However, it concentrated resources into pilots with histories of decarbonization, ignoring sites with the greatest need, willingness, and capability to decarbonize. Consequently, the pilot cases mainly repackaged pre-pilot achievements for political purposes and offered little substantive innovation. This selection mechanism can be improved by setting short-term political value aside and prioritizing pilots that can generate significant carbon emission reductions and offer a diverse range of lessons.
AB - Climate experimentation is an influential governance strategy for enacting socio-technical and policy innovations. In this study, we investigated how upper-level governments in China establish policy networks to conduct climate experiments. Using the Near-Zero Carbon Pilot program in Guangdong as a case study, we identified a selection strategy that exhibited a strong preference for pilots with a proven track record in decarbonization. We argue that this strategy was driven by political objectives, including meeting central government agenda and showcasing local successes. However, it concentrated resources into pilots with histories of decarbonization, ignoring sites with the greatest need, willingness, and capability to decarbonize. Consequently, the pilot cases mainly repackaged pre-pilot achievements for political purposes and offered little substantive innovation. This selection mechanism can be improved by setting short-term political value aside and prioritizing pilots that can generate significant carbon emission reductions and offer a diverse range of lessons.
KW - China
KW - Climate governance
KW - Policy network
KW - Selection strategies
KW - Top-down climate experimentation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85189834307&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.erss.2024.103539
DO - 10.1016/j.erss.2024.103539
M3 - Journal article
AN - SCOPUS:85189834307
SN - 2214-6296
VL - 113
JO - Energy Research and Social Science
JF - Energy Research and Social Science
M1 - 103539
ER -