Abstract
This paper argues that the tendency in contemporary discussion to overlook the logical roots of pragmatistic philosophy is a symptom of taking language as a universal medium of expression. My thesis is that the two presuppositions concerning the role of logic in pragmatism, universalism and its denial of calculism, delineate two kinds of pragmatisms, pragmatism and pragmaticism. I conclude that the latter, which was Peirce’s original formulation, is methodologically the more tolerant of the two and hence embraces pluralism over and above pragmatism.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 247-260 |
Number of pages | 14 |
Journal | Cognitio: Revista De Filosofia |
Volume | 9 |
Issue number | 2 |
Publication status | Published - Jul 2008 |
User-Defined Keywords
- Pragmatism
- Pragmaticism
- Logic
- Universalism
- Calculism
- Peirce