Abstract
Subject handedness is an important parameter to be evaluated and accounted for in neuroscience studies dealing with laterality. The aim of this study was to survey for the details of how researchers administered the Edinburgh handedness inventory (EHI) to assess subject handedness. Web of Science and PubMed databases was searched on 3 August 2021 to identify functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) articles published since 2013 using the EHI or citing Oldfield, the original paper that introduced the EHI. Articles not actually using the EHI and/or its variants were excluded. Two reviewers performed the screening independently and disagreements were solved by mutual consensus. Most of the 406 studies using the EHI did not report details regarding the number of items (94.1%), identity of items (96.1%), response format (97.0%), and cutoff score for right-handedness (87.2%). Items were found dropped or replaced, with response format and cutoff score changed without citing references that justified the modifications. A clearer reporting of the details of the EHI as an assessment tool for determining subject handedness should be encouraged.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 221-231 |
| Number of pages | 11 |
| Journal | Laterality |
| Volume | 27 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| Early online date | 28 Sept 2021 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 4 Mar 2022 |
User-Defined Keywords
- best practice
- Hand preference
- handedness
- laterality
- manual preference
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The non-transparent usage and reporting of the Edinburgh Handedness Inventory in functional magnetic resonance imaging literature: a survey of studies published since 2013'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver