Abstract
Countermobilization has been a common strategy for autocrats to
counteract the threat of opposition. Although the use of
countermobilization has drawn scholarly attention, research on the
mechanisms that enable countermobilization remains limited. This article
underscores the role of political institutions in allowing autocrats to
carry out countermobilization through incentivizing elites to serve as a
bridge between the state and the masses. Focusing on the case of Hong
Kong, where pro-government countermobilization is rising along with
pro-democracy challenges against the hybrid regime, the article argues
that countermobilization is enabled because societal elites are
incentivized through political institutions to organize the masses and
develop mobilization capacity through grassroots organizations. Using
original elite biographical data and organizational data, the article
shows that elites with more ties with grassroots organizations are more
likely to remain in office in the Chinese People's Political
Consultative Conference. The findings offer an institutionalist
explanation of how authoritarian rulers enact countermobilization by
leveraging elite intermediaries and their grassroots networks. In this
light, political institutions can serve as a conduit for the state to
extend social control.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 316-337 |
Number of pages | 22 |
Journal | Government and Opposition |
Volume | 58 |
Issue number | 2 |
Early online date | 28 Sept 2021 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Apr 2023 |
Scopus Subject Areas
- Sociology and Political Science
- Public Administration
User-Defined Keywords
- countermobilization
- Hong Kong
- hybrid regime
- political institutions
- united front