Abstract
In two recent articles, Johannes Grössl offers a thorough examination of the difficulties concerning Christ's impeccability and claims that no Christological model has yet to resolve them. Using the Divine Preconscious Model and interacting with contemporary discussions concerning divine omnipotence and moral perfection and the distinction between directly and indirectly free actions, I defend the possibility that God Incarnate possesses libertarian freedom without desires for evil choices, given which it is metaphysically impossible for him to choose evil. I show that my proposal is able to answer Grössl's objections and is superior to other proposals.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 243-261 |
| Number of pages | 19 |
| Journal | Faith and Philosophy |
| Volume | 40 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| Publication status | Published - 4 Jan 2023 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The Impeccability of Christ, Divine Omnipotence, and Moral Perfection'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver