Abstract
Grounded in the values congruence proposition, this study examined the interplay between leadership styles and corporate social responsibility (CSR) motives in different crisis contexts. The results of a 2 (crisis type) × 2 (leadership style) × 2 (CSR motives) between-subjects experiment showed that the congruent combination of leadership styles and CSR motives maximized the insulating effect of CSR practice but only when the crisis type was victim. In a victim crisis, utilizing intrinsic CSR motives gained greater word-of-mouth intention and purchase intention when combined with transformational leadership than with transactional leadership. In a preventable crisis, the positive effect of values congruence disappeared and even backfired. More specifically, the congruence between transactional leadership and extrinsic CSR motives amplified the negative impact of a crisis. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 92-123 |
| Number of pages | 32 |
| Journal | Management Communication Quarterly |
| Volume | 36 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| Early online date | 21 Jun 2021 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Feb 2022 |
User-Defined Keywords
- corporate social responsibility
- crisis type
- persuasion knowledge model
- transactional leadership
- transformational leadership
- values congruence