Abstract
Every utterance we make signals our stance – toward someone, something,
someplace, some event or situation or some idea. Essentially, our stance
is the expression of our beliefs, perspectives, evaluations, and
attitudes and can be expressed explicitly (e.g. I don’t like this) or
implicitly (e.g. I guess this will do). It can be detected, not only at
the clausal level as just shown, but also at the lexical (e.g. awful)
and phrasal (e.g. not quite what I expect) levels as well (Xing, 2006).
Naturally, for a more comprehensive assessment of a speaker’s stance, we
will need to evaluate numerous utterances – sometimes on multiple
occasions, and in various contexts, and on a broader scale at the
discourse level as well. The focus of this chapter is on stance markers
that have emerged as a result of frequent and conventionalized usage,
often involving pragmatic implicature. Among the stance markers to be
discussed in this chapter are epistemic, evidential and attitudinal
markers. We will focus on three major pathways for the emergence of
these stance markers in Chinese, namely, the verbal, nominal and
indexical pathways.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | The Routledge Handbook of Chinese Discourse Analysis |
Editors | Chris Shei |
Publisher | Routledge |
Chapter | 15 |
Pages | 230-243 |
Number of pages | 14 |
ISBN (Electronic) | 9781315213705 |
ISBN (Print) | 9780415789790 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 14 Jan 2019 |