The European parliament and the co-decision procedure: A reassessment

Roger M. Scully*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

70 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In this paper, I reassess the co-decision legislative procedure introduced by the Maastricht Treaty on European Union. Specifically, I examine the dispute as to whether co-decision enhanced or diminished the European Parliament's influence over EU law making. Employing a combination of formal analysis of the different stages of the procedure and evidence from its actual operation, I argue that Garrett and Tsebelis’ claim that co-decision reduces Parliament's legislative powers is both theoretically and empirically unsupported. The implications for the Parliament's position within European politics are evaluated in the conclusion.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)58-73
Number of pages16
JournalThe Journal of Legislative Studies
Volume3
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sept 1997

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The European parliament and the co-decision procedure: A reassessment'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this