TY - JOUR
T1 - The Effect of Slow Motion Video on Consumer Inference
AU - Yin, Yunlu
AU - Jia, Jayson S.
AU - Zheng, Wanyi
N1 - Funding Information:
The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This research was supported by research grants from the Hong Kong Research Grants Council (14505217 and 17506316) awarded to the second author.
Publisher Copyright:
© American Marketing Association 2021
PY - 2021/10
Y1 - 2021/10
N2 - Video advertisements often show actors and influence agents consuming
and enjoying products in slow motion. By prolonging depictions of
influence agents’ consumption utility, slow motion cinematographic
effects ostensibly enhance social proof and signal product qualities
that are otherwise difficult to infer visually (e.g., pleasant tastes,
smells, haptic sensations). In this research, seven studies, including
an eye tracking study, a Facebook Ads field experiment, and lab and
online experiments—all using real ads across diverse
contexts—demonstrate that slow motion (vs. natural speed) can backfire
and undercut product appeal by making the influence agent’s behavior
seem more intentional and extrinsically motivated. The authors rule out
several alternative explanations by showing that the effect attenuates
for individuals with lower intentionality bias, is mitigated under
cognitive load, and reverses when ads use nonhuman influence agents. The
authors conclude by highlighting the potential for cross-pollination
between visual information processing and social cognition research,
particularly in contexts such as persuasion and trust, and they discuss
managerial implications for visual marketing, especially on digital and
social platforms.
AB - Video advertisements often show actors and influence agents consuming
and enjoying products in slow motion. By prolonging depictions of
influence agents’ consumption utility, slow motion cinematographic
effects ostensibly enhance social proof and signal product qualities
that are otherwise difficult to infer visually (e.g., pleasant tastes,
smells, haptic sensations). In this research, seven studies, including
an eye tracking study, a Facebook Ads field experiment, and lab and
online experiments—all using real ads across diverse
contexts—demonstrate that slow motion (vs. natural speed) can backfire
and undercut product appeal by making the influence agent’s behavior
seem more intentional and extrinsically motivated. The authors rule out
several alternative explanations by showing that the effect attenuates
for individuals with lower intentionality bias, is mitigated under
cognitive load, and reverses when ads use nonhuman influence agents. The
authors conclude by highlighting the potential for cross-pollination
between visual information processing and social cognition research,
particularly in contexts such as persuasion and trust, and they discuss
managerial implications for visual marketing, especially on digital and
social platforms.
KW - audiovisual media
KW - eye tracking
KW - intentionality
KW - slow motion video
KW - visual marketing
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85114997625&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/00222437211025054
DO - 10.1177/00222437211025054
M3 - Journal article
AN - SCOPUS:85114997625
SN - 0022-2437
VL - 58
SP - 1007
EP - 1024
JO - Journal of Marketing Research
JF - Journal of Marketing Research
IS - 5
ER -