The Common Good

P. C. Lo, David Solomon

    Research output: Chapter in book/report/conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

    Abstract

    The common good is an essentially contested concept in contemporary moral and political discussions. Although the notion of the common good has a slightly antique air, especially in discussions in the North Atlantic, it has figured prominently in both the sophisticated theoretical accounts of moral and political theory in recent years and also in the popular arguments brought for particular political policies and for more general orientations toward policy. It has been at home both in the political arsenal of the left and the right. It has had special significance in ethical and political debates in modern and modernizing cultures. Broadly Aristotelian views about community, family, and the common good have played an important role in Western debates about the impact of modernizing trends on traditional intermediate institutions. Similarly, debates in East Asian cultures traditionally influenced by Confucian teachings have worried about these same influences. Both Aristotelianism in the West and Confucianism in the East have been to some extent pushed aside from the center of contemporary political debate, but both remain options frequently sought out by those uncomfortable with some of the more unsettling features of modern culture.
    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationThe Common Good: Chinese and American Perspectives
    EditorsDavid Solomon, P.C. Lo
    Place of PublicationDordrecht
    PublisherSpringer
    Pages3-18
    Number of pages16
    Edition1st
    ISBN (Electronic)9789400772724
    ISBN (Print)9789400772717, 9789402400731
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 19 Nov 2013

    Publication series

    NamePhilosophical Studies in Contemporary Culture
    Volume23
    ISSN (Print)0928-9518
    ISSN (Electronic)2215-1753

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'The Common Good'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this