The Bretons in French Politics: Regional Mobilization within and beyond the Central State

Alistair Cole*, Romain Pasquier

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

    1 Citation (Scopus)

    Abstract

    This article revisits the French region of Brittany on the basis of sustained empirical research over a 25-year period. It identifies the twin use of influence and identity as forming a key part of an accepted and largely diffused territorial repertoire, based on affirming distinctiveness for reasons of vertical linkage, as well as horizontal capacity building. This article explores the different facets of this model of territorial influence. The two twin dimensions concern: first, a well-versed mechanism of lobbying central institutions and actors to defend the Breton interest; second, the use of territorial identity markers to forward the regional cause, relying on social movements and a broad capacity for regional mobilization. Within this overarching context, the Breton case demonstrates an intelligent instrumental use of identity and identity markers, but mainstream Breton forces recognize that this only makes sense in the light of the national level of regulation and structure of opportunities. The logic of this position is to integrate the Brittany region into a national model of territorial integration, while playing up identity markers to secure the maximum benefit for the region.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)1074-1089
    Number of pages16
    JournalNationalities Papers
    Volume51
    Issue number5
    Early online date7 Oct 2021
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Sept 2023

    Scopus Subject Areas

    • Geography, Planning and Development
    • History
    • Political Science and International Relations

    User-Defined Keywords

    • Brittany
    • France
    • Paris
    • decentralization
    • regionalism

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'The Bretons in French Politics: Regional Mobilization within and beyond the Central State'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this