TY - JOUR
T1 - Testing (Quizzing) Boosts Classroom Learning
T2 - A Systematic and Meta-Analytic Review
AU - Yang, Chunliang
AU - Luo, Liang
AU - Vadillo, Miguel A.
AU - Yu, Rongjun
AU - Shanks, David R.
N1 - Funding Information:
This research was supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (2019NTSS28), the Natural Science Foundation of China (31671130; 32000742), the NUS FASS RSB-PDF Scheme under WBS (C-581-000-207-532; C-581-000-777-532), the United Kingdom Economic and Social Research Council (ES/S014616/1), and the MadrI+D Science Foundation (2016-T1/SOC-1395).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 American Psychological Association
PY - 2021/4
Y1 - 2021/4
N2 - Over the last century hundreds of studies have demonstrated that testing is an effective intervention to enhance long-term retention of studied knowledge and facilitate mastery of new information, compared with restudying and many other learning strategies (e.g., concept mapping), a phenomenon termed the testing effect. How robust is this effect in applied settings beyond the laboratory? The current review integrated 48,478 students’ data, extracted from 222 independent studies, to investigate the magnitude, boundary conditions, and psychological underpinnings of test-enhanced learning in the classroom. The results show that overall testing (quizzing) raises student academic achievement to a medium extent (g = 0.499). The magnitude of the effect is modulated by a variety of factors, including learning strategy in the control condition, test format consistency, material matching, provision of corrective feedback, number of test repetitions, test administration location and timepoint, treatment duration, and experimental design. The documented findings support 3 theories to account for the classroom testing effect: additional exposure, transfer-appropriate processing, and motivation. In addition to their implications for theory development, these results have practical significance for enhancing teaching practice and guiding education policy and highlight important directions for future research.
AB - Over the last century hundreds of studies have demonstrated that testing is an effective intervention to enhance long-term retention of studied knowledge and facilitate mastery of new information, compared with restudying and many other learning strategies (e.g., concept mapping), a phenomenon termed the testing effect. How robust is this effect in applied settings beyond the laboratory? The current review integrated 48,478 students’ data, extracted from 222 independent studies, to investigate the magnitude, boundary conditions, and psychological underpinnings of test-enhanced learning in the classroom. The results show that overall testing (quizzing) raises student academic achievement to a medium extent (g = 0.499). The magnitude of the effect is modulated by a variety of factors, including learning strategy in the control condition, test format consistency, material matching, provision of corrective feedback, number of test repetitions, test administration location and timepoint, treatment duration, and experimental design. The documented findings support 3 theories to account for the classroom testing effect: additional exposure, transfer-appropriate processing, and motivation. In addition to their implications for theory development, these results have practical significance for enhancing teaching practice and guiding education policy and highlight important directions for future research.
KW - Academic achievement
KW - Meta-analysis
KW - Motivation
KW - Testing effect
KW - Transfer-appropriate processing
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85110201413&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1037/bul0000309
DO - 10.1037/bul0000309
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 33683913
AN - SCOPUS:85110201413
SN - 0033-2909
VL - 147
SP - 399
EP - 435
JO - Psychological Bulletin
JF - Psychological Bulletin
IS - 4
ER -