Tertiary-Level Students’ English Writing Performance and Metacognitive Awareness: A Group Metacognitive Support Perspective

Feng Teng*

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

    50 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Recent research has highlighted the role of group metacognitive guidance in English writing. The present study was to examine 120 Chinese students learning English as a foreign language (EFL) participating in two different group metacognitive support methods for a college writing course—group feedback guidance (GFG) and self-explanation guidance (SEG)—compared with a control group (CG) not receiving metacognitive guidance. This study explored the effects of each method on participants’ writing, transfer ability, and metacognitive awareness. The results indicate that GFG learners demonstrated the highest mean scores on all measures, followed by SEG learners and CG learners. Qualitative data collected from journal entries show that GFG learners tend to exhibit different metacognitive regulation processes, display a high level of task perception, and develop an awareness and use of metacognitive strategies. Discussions and implications based on these findings are compared to studies conducted in Nordic countries.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)551-568
    Number of pages18
    JournalScandinavian Journal of Educational Research
    Volume64
    Issue number4
    Early online date2 Apr 2020
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 6 Jun 2020

    User-Defined Keywords

    • group feedback guidance
    • Group metacognitive support
    • metacognitive awareness
    • self-explanation guidance
    • writing

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Tertiary-Level Students’ English Writing Performance and Metacognitive Awareness: A Group Metacognitive Support Perspective'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this