Abstract
We interviewed Vietnamese and Chinese technical intern trainees who went
to Japan under Japan's Technical Intern Training Program (TITP). We
showed how Vietnam's and China's temporary labor-export institutional
arrangements differed, and contributed to the two countries’ intern
trainees having varied migration experiences and outcomes. We also
explored the reasons TITP failed to achieve its stated
objective—international skill transfer. Guided by human capital theory,
we attempt to make sense of the different migration expectations and
experiences of Vietnamese and Chinese trainees under different
institutional arrangements and contribute to the debate of temporary
labor migration and international skill transfer. We argue that the
government of a temporary migrant labor-sending country must exercise
sufficiently good socio-technical infrastructural governance to steward
labor-export policy and industrial policy to match national development
goals in order to make international skill transfer possible.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 606-626 |
Number of pages | 21 |
Journal | Journal of Social Issues |
Volume | 78 |
Issue number | 3 |
Early online date | 2 Aug 2021 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Sept 2022 |
Scopus Subject Areas
- General Social Sciences