Telling lies together? Sharing news as a form of social authentication

Barui K Waruwu*, Edson C Tandoc Jr, Andrew Duffy, Nuri Kim, Rich Ling

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

29 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The increasingly assertive position of social media as a news source means that news audiences can no longer depend on traditional journalists for information verification. Instead, they must determine the news credibility on their own. The majority of information credibility studies have considered news audiences’ information evaluation as a purely cognitive endeavor, implying that individuals can arrive at valid information without social validation. By drawing on self-categorization theory, this article re-conceptualizes audiences’ acts of news authentication by considering it not as a one-off activity under the uncontested control of the individual, but as a cycle of collective authentication strategies whereby individual authentication and social validation are entangled in the context-dependent processing of social news. To do this, we unpacked the social dimension of news authentication by looking at the social motivation, strategies, as well as the consequences that support it through a series of focus group discussions in Singapore.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2516-2533
Number of pages18
JournalNew Media and Society
Volume23
Issue number9
Early online date10 Jun 2020
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sept 2021
Externally publishedYes

User-Defined Keywords

  • Audiences’ acts of authentication
  • fake news
  • information credibility
  • news sharing
  • self-categorization theory
  • social media news

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Telling lies together? Sharing news as a form of social authentication'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this