TY - JOUR
T1 - tDCS effect on prosocial behavior
T2 - A meta-analytic review
AU - Yuan, Bo
AU - Tolomeo, Serenella
AU - Yang, Chunliang
AU - Wang, Ying
AU - Yu, Rongjun
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31600914; 32000742) and Ministry of Education Singapore (MOE2017-SSRTG-026). ST has received unrestricted educational grants from Indivior, Lundbeck Foundation and Merck Serono.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 The Author(s) 2021.
PY - 2022/1
Y1 - 2022/1
N2 - Previous studies have shown that transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) could potentially promote prosocial behaviors. However, results from randomized controlled trials are inconsistent. The current meta-analysis aimed to assess the effects of anodal and cathodal tDCS using single-session protocols on prosocial behaviors in healthy young adults and explore potential moderators of these effects. The results showed that compared with sham stimulation, anodal (excitatory) stimulation significantly increased (g = 0.27, 95% CI [0.11, 0.43], Z = 3.30, P = 0.001) and cathodal (inhibitory) stimulation significantly decreased prosocial behaviors (g = -0.19, 95% CI [-0.39, -0.01], Z = -1.95, P = 0.051) using a multilevel meta-analytic model. These effects were not significantly modulated by stimulation parameters (e.g. duration, intensity and site) and types of prosocial behavior. The risk of publication bias for the included effects was minimal, and no selective reporting (e.g. P-hacking) was found in the P-curve analysis. This meta-analysis showed that both anodal and cathodal tDCS have small but significant effects on prosocial behaviors. The current study provides evidence that prosocial behaviors are linked to the activity of the 'social brain'. Future studies are encouraged to further explore whether tDCS could effectively treat social dysfunctions in psychiatry disorders.
AB - Previous studies have shown that transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) could potentially promote prosocial behaviors. However, results from randomized controlled trials are inconsistent. The current meta-analysis aimed to assess the effects of anodal and cathodal tDCS using single-session protocols on prosocial behaviors in healthy young adults and explore potential moderators of these effects. The results showed that compared with sham stimulation, anodal (excitatory) stimulation significantly increased (g = 0.27, 95% CI [0.11, 0.43], Z = 3.30, P = 0.001) and cathodal (inhibitory) stimulation significantly decreased prosocial behaviors (g = -0.19, 95% CI [-0.39, -0.01], Z = -1.95, P = 0.051) using a multilevel meta-analytic model. These effects were not significantly modulated by stimulation parameters (e.g. duration, intensity and site) and types of prosocial behavior. The risk of publication bias for the included effects was minimal, and no selective reporting (e.g. P-hacking) was found in the P-curve analysis. This meta-analysis showed that both anodal and cathodal tDCS have small but significant effects on prosocial behaviors. The current study provides evidence that prosocial behaviors are linked to the activity of the 'social brain'. Future studies are encouraged to further explore whether tDCS could effectively treat social dysfunctions in psychiatry disorders.
KW - meta-analysis
KW - prosocial behavior
KW - stimulation parameters
KW - transcranial direct current stimulation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85124433596&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/scan/nsab067
DO - 10.1093/scan/nsab067
M3 - Review article
C2 - 34027543
SN - 1749-5016
VL - 17
SP - 26
EP - 42
JO - Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience
JF - Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience
IS - 1
ER -