Task familiarity and task efficacy: A study of sports coaches

Lena FUNG*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to establish a profile of coaching efficacy with Hong Kong community coaches who differ in knowledge and hours spent in coaching. Coaching efficacy can be described in four dimensions, namely, Motivation, Strategy, Technique, and Character Building. It was hypothesized that coaches who had spent more time coaching and were more knowledgeable about the sport and coaching would score higher on those four dimensions of a Coaching Efficacy Scale. The scale was administered to 252 coaches working with beginning and district-level athletes in a variety of sports. Analysis suggested that their self-reported efficacy on Strategy was least strong. This means that the coaches were not confident in analyzing the strengths and weaknesses of opposing teams, making decisions on the type of game strategy to employ, and maximizing athletes' strength in competitions. Coaches with less coaching experience were also less confident about motivating athletes. This information on coaching efficacy may be useful in deciding content for a program of education for coaching.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)367-372
Number of pages6
JournalPerceptual and Motor Skills
Volume95
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2002

Scopus Subject Areas

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Sensory Systems

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Task familiarity and task efficacy: A study of sports coaches'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this