Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Sulfur dioxide residue in sulfur-fumigated edible herbs: The fewer, the safer?

  • Su Min Duan
  • , Jun XU
  • , Ying Jia Bai
  • , Yan Ding
  • , Ming Kong
  • , Huan Huan Liu
  • , Xiu Yang Li
  • , Qing Shan Zhang
  • , Hubiao CHEN
  • , Li Fang Liu*
  • , Song Lin Li
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

42 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Abstract The residual content of sulfur dioxide is frequently regarded as the exclusive indicator in the safety evaluation of sulfur-fumigated edible herbs. To examine the feasibility of such assessment criteria, here the variations in residual sulfur dioxide content during sulfur-fumigation and the potential mechanisms involved were investigated, using Angelicae Sinensis Radix (ASR) as a model herb. The residual sulfur dioxide content and ten major bioactive components in sulfur-fumigated ASR samples were dynamically examined at 13 successive time points within 72 h sulfur-fumigation. The relationship between the content variation tendency of sulfur dioxide and the ten chemicals was discussed. The results suggested that sulfur dioxide-involved chemical transformation of the original components in ASR might cause large consumption of residual sulfur dioxide during sulfur-fumigation. It implies that without considering the induced chemical transformation of bioactive components, the residual sulfur dioxide content alone might be inadequate to comprehensively evaluate the safety of sulfur-fumigated herbs.

Original languageEnglish
Article number17798
Pages (from-to)119-124
Number of pages6
JournalFood Chemistry
Volume192
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 8 Jul 2016

User-Defined Keywords

  • Angelicae Sinensis Radix
  • Chemical transformation
  • Sulfur dioxide residue
  • Sulfur-fumigation
  • Variation tendency

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Sulfur dioxide residue in sulfur-fumigated edible herbs: The fewer, the safer?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this