TY - JOUR
T1 - Structuring learning activities
AU - SIVAN, Atara
AU - Kember, David
N1 - Copyright:
Copyright 2020 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 1996
Y1 - 1996
N2 - Examination of different learning activities can give an insight into their effectiveness for the learning process. The present paper seeks to identify basic structural features of learning activities through their analysis, comparison and evaluation. The paper suggests a structural framework for describing learning activities based on an exploratory study carried out within the Hong Kong Polytechnic. A total of 41 activities from six courses in three departments were involved. The activities were evaluated through participant observation, feedback questionnaire and semi-structured interviews with students participating in the courses. A factor analysis of evaluation data on activities of each course extracted several factors which served as a basis for creating a classification system of structural features. The structural framework divides activities into four phases: introduction, preparation, presentation and debriefing. The factor analysis has suggested the need to incorporate both the size and the nature of groups in each activity as combined additional elements. Differences were found between individual, small group and the whole class activities as well as between interactive and one-way format of activities. Analysis of students' evaluations revealed that activities in a group format and with a higher level of interaction were thought to be more educationally effective than individual activities or those involving presentations to plenary groups.
AB - Examination of different learning activities can give an insight into their effectiveness for the learning process. The present paper seeks to identify basic structural features of learning activities through their analysis, comparison and evaluation. The paper suggests a structural framework for describing learning activities based on an exploratory study carried out within the Hong Kong Polytechnic. A total of 41 activities from six courses in three departments were involved. The activities were evaluated through participant observation, feedback questionnaire and semi-structured interviews with students participating in the courses. A factor analysis of evaluation data on activities of each course extracted several factors which served as a basis for creating a classification system of structural features. The structural framework divides activities into four phases: introduction, preparation, presentation and debriefing. The factor analysis has suggested the need to incorporate both the size and the nature of groups in each activity as combined additional elements. Differences were found between individual, small group and the whole class activities as well as between interactive and one-way format of activities. Analysis of students' evaluations revealed that activities in a group format and with a higher level of interaction were thought to be more educationally effective than individual activities or those involving presentations to plenary groups.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=26444543379&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/1355800960330407
DO - 10.1080/1355800960330407
M3 - Journal article
AN - SCOPUS:26444543379
SN - 1470-3297
VL - 33
SP - 203
EP - 212
JO - Innovations in Education and Teaching International
JF - Innovations in Education and Teaching International
IS - 4
ER -