TY - JOUR
T1 - Statistical inference for equivalence trials with ordinal responses
T2 - A latent normal distribution approach
AU - Tang, Man Lai
AU - Poon, Wai Yin
N1 - Funding Information:
The work described in this paper was partially supported by grants from the Research Grants Council of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China (Project Nos. CUHK4242/03H and CUHK4371/04M). The authors are grateful to two anonymous referees and the Co-Editor for valuable suggestions for improving the paper, and Professor M. Neale and his associates for providing the Mx program at no cost.
PY - 2007/8/15
Y1 - 2007/8/15
N2 - Testing of equivalence/non-inferiority has become an essential component in modern drug and treatment assessment. Before a newly developed treatment is introduced and applied to its target population, it is necessary to compare it to an existing (reference/standard) treatment. Unlike the traditional trial of testing the equality between two treatments, an equivalence trial, for instance, attempts to demonstrate that the responses to two treatments differ by an amount which is clinically insignificant. In many applications, the outcome measures of interest are usually recorded in ordinal scale (e.g., very good; good; moderate; poor). This paper presents a simple approach to the problem of equivalence testing in the presence of ordered categorical data. The proposed methodology operates on the assumption that the observed ordinal variable is governed by an underlying normally distributed trait. The new approach can be readily adopted for (i) commonly used equivalence limits such as difference and the ratio of treatment means and (ii) both one-sided non-inferiority and two-sided equivalence trials. We illustrate our methodology with two medical examples and demonstrate how test results and confidence interval estimates can be obtained from a freely available computer program.
AB - Testing of equivalence/non-inferiority has become an essential component in modern drug and treatment assessment. Before a newly developed treatment is introduced and applied to its target population, it is necessary to compare it to an existing (reference/standard) treatment. Unlike the traditional trial of testing the equality between two treatments, an equivalence trial, for instance, attempts to demonstrate that the responses to two treatments differ by an amount which is clinically insignificant. In many applications, the outcome measures of interest are usually recorded in ordinal scale (e.g., very good; good; moderate; poor). This paper presents a simple approach to the problem of equivalence testing in the presence of ordered categorical data. The proposed methodology operates on the assumption that the observed ordinal variable is governed by an underlying normally distributed trait. The new approach can be readily adopted for (i) commonly used equivalence limits such as difference and the ratio of treatment means and (ii) both one-sided non-inferiority and two-sided equivalence trials. We illustrate our methodology with two medical examples and demonstrate how test results and confidence interval estimates can be obtained from a freely available computer program.
KW - Equivalence trials
KW - Latent variable
KW - Maximum likelihood method
KW - Mx
KW - Ordinal response
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34547225179&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.csda.2006.11.009
DO - 10.1016/j.csda.2006.11.009
M3 - Journal article
AN - SCOPUS:34547225179
SN - 0167-9473
VL - 51
SP - 5918
EP - 5926
JO - Computational Statistics and Data Analysis
JF - Computational Statistics and Data Analysis
IS - 12
ER -