TY - JOUR
T1 - States of convergence in territorial governance
AU - Cole, Alistair Mark
AU - Harguindéguy, Jean Baptiste
AU - Stafford, Ian
AU - Pasquier, Romain
AU - De Visscher, Christian
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors would like to thank the three anonymous referees, as well as Arthur Benz (Darmstadt), Vincent Della Sala (Trento), and Virginie van Ingelgom (Louvain-la-Neuve) each of whom read earlier drafts of this article and made invaluable suggestions for improvement. This work was supported by the Leverhulme Trust (IN-2012-109) as part of the International Network on Territorial Governance between Convergence and Capacity. The team is deeply indebted to the Trust for it support. In addition, Alistair Cole is very grateful to the Collegium de Lyon, which provided an excellent environment for the completion of this article in 2014.
PY - 2015/4/1
Y1 - 2015/4/1
N2 - This article engages questions of policy convergence and divergence in four social-democratic European regions (Andalucía, Brittany, Wales, and Wallonia) in a period of economic crisis and ongoing political decentralization. It develops an analytical framework, the "States of Convergence," as a useful heuristic for understanding the interplay between convergence and divergence pressures, and processes of territorial adaptation and translation. Processes of hard and soft convergence and divergence operate in distinctive ways depending upon whether inputs, outcomes, processes, or institutions are considered. Hard convergence arguments are most convincing in terms of inputs (referring to pressures of international ranking and rating, tougher European Union budgetary rules, enhanced central steering and tighter controls on public expenditure). They are less cogent for understanding outputs, institutions, and processes.
AB - This article engages questions of policy convergence and divergence in four social-democratic European regions (Andalucía, Brittany, Wales, and Wallonia) in a period of economic crisis and ongoing political decentralization. It develops an analytical framework, the "States of Convergence," as a useful heuristic for understanding the interplay between convergence and divergence pressures, and processes of territorial adaptation and translation. Processes of hard and soft convergence and divergence operate in distinctive ways depending upon whether inputs, outcomes, processes, or institutions are considered. Hard convergence arguments are most convincing in terms of inputs (referring to pressures of international ranking and rating, tougher European Union budgetary rules, enhanced central steering and tighter controls on public expenditure). They are less cogent for understanding outputs, institutions, and processes.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84988226838&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/publius/pjv001
DO - 10.1093/publius/pjv001
M3 - Journal article
AN - SCOPUS:84988226838
SN - 0048-5950
VL - 45
SP - 297
EP - 321
JO - Publius: The Journal of Federalism
JF - Publius: The Journal of Federalism
IS - 2
ER -