TY - JOUR
T1 - State capitalism, fragmented authoritarianism, and the politics of energy policymaking
T2 - Policy networks and electricity market liberalization in Guangdong, China
AU - Lo, Kevin
AU - Mah, Daphne Ngar yin
N1 - This work was supported by the General Research Fund (12600718) and General Research Fund (12602717) of the Research Grants Council of Hong Kong.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2024/1
Y1 - 2024/1
N2 - Studying the politics of energy policymaking is crucial for understanding how energy policies are formulated and the factors that influence their development. This study focuses on policy networks which play an important role in energy policymaking. Analyzing policy networks can help unveil the politics of energy policymaking, especially by identifying powerful actors and their agendas. This study examined energy policy networks with regard to electricity market liberalization (EML) in China. We examined the composition, functions, and limitations of energy policy networks. We argued that, situated within the political economy of state capitalism and fragmented authoritarianism, independent stakeholders are marginalized from networked energy policymaking, which is dominated by state-owned companies and government actors. Consequently, the development of EML policy has produced biases that have undermined the objectives EML aims to achieve, such as introducing independent actors to reduce the dominance of state-owned enterprises and removing government intervention in pricing. The findings suggest that EML reform in China can benefit from adopting more inclusive policy networks and soliciting the opinions of heterogeneous stakeholders.
AB - Studying the politics of energy policymaking is crucial for understanding how energy policies are formulated and the factors that influence their development. This study focuses on policy networks which play an important role in energy policymaking. Analyzing policy networks can help unveil the politics of energy policymaking, especially by identifying powerful actors and their agendas. This study examined energy policy networks with regard to electricity market liberalization (EML) in China. We examined the composition, functions, and limitations of energy policy networks. We argued that, situated within the political economy of state capitalism and fragmented authoritarianism, independent stakeholders are marginalized from networked energy policymaking, which is dominated by state-owned companies and government actors. Consequently, the development of EML policy has produced biases that have undermined the objectives EML aims to achieve, such as introducing independent actors to reduce the dominance of state-owned enterprises and removing government intervention in pricing. The findings suggest that EML reform in China can benefit from adopting more inclusive policy networks and soliciting the opinions of heterogeneous stakeholders.
KW - China
KW - Electricity market liberalization
KW - Energy policy network
KW - Energy politics
KW - Political economy
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85177882950&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.erss.2023.103348
DO - 10.1016/j.erss.2023.103348
M3 - Journal article
AN - SCOPUS:85177882950
SN - 2214-6296
VL - 107
JO - Energy Research and Social Science
JF - Energy Research and Social Science
M1 - 103348
ER -