TY - JOUR
T1 - Social and ecological factors associated with the use of non-timber forest products by people in rural Borneo
AU - Sakai, Shoko
AU - Choy, Yee Keong
AU - Kishimoto-Yamada, Keiko
AU - Takano, Kohei T.
AU - Ichikawa, Masahiro
AU - Samejima, Hiromitsu
AU - Kato, Yumi
AU - Soda, Ryoji
AU - Ushio, Masayuki
AU - Saizen, Izuru
AU - Nakashizuka, Tohru
AU - Itioka, Takao
N1 - Funding information:
We are grateful to the State Planning Unit, Chief Minister's Department of Sarawak, Malaysia, for permission and support to conduct this study (Ref (81), UPN/S/G1/10.1 Vol., approved on April 18, 2008 for M. I.). We also thank the generous participation of households in the socio-economic survey; many collaborators in both Sarawak and Japan, who collected, digitized, and checked the data; Miyako Koizumi for considerable support for data collection and critical comments on an earlier version of the manuscript; Norio Yamamura, Reiichiro Ishii, and other members of the EcoNet project for discussions; Noriyuki Osada for valuable suggestions regarding the statistical analyses; Satoshi Yamashita for information on mushrooms used by indigenous people; and the Centre of Remote Imaging, Sensing and Processing (CRISP) at the National University of Singapore for provision of the land cover map. The socio-economic survey for this study was conducted as part of the research project “Collapse and Restoration of Ecosystem Networks with Human Activity” funded by the Research Institute of Humanity and Nature. This study was also financially supported by a Grant-in-Aid (no. 25340111 to S.S.) from the Japanese Ministry of Education, Science and Culture.
Publisher copyright:
© 2016 Elsevier Ltd.
PY - 2016/12
Y1 - 2016/12
N2 - Supply of non-timber Forest Products (NTFPs) is an important provisioning ecosystem service. It is often argued that forest conservation contributes to poverty alleviation through provisioning of NTFPs to the poor. However, implicit assumptions of the argument that NTFPs are more intensively utilized by poor who lack alternative subsistence options, and that NTFP supplies are limited by forest cover, have rarely been critically examined. This study investigated social and environmental factors affecting NTFP uses in rural areas of Borneo, using a land cover map and socio-economic dataset collected from 1596 households in 87 villages. The NTFPs examined were wild boars, sambar deer, wild fruits, firewood, wild vegetables, and wild mushrooms. To explain the variations in NTFP uses among households, four village and nine household characteristics were considered using generalized linear mixed models. We found that forest cover and collection pressure limit the use of some NTFPs, supporting the second assumption. On the other hand, the first assumption was supported only for firewood, and animals and wild fruits were more frequently used by wealthier households, contrary to this assumption. Other factors (education, age and sex of householder and agricultural activities) were also related to the use of one or more NTFPs. This study demonstrates the complexity of the process by which forest cover and other factors affect the ecosystem services people receive. Evaluation of ecosystem services is an important and urgent research subject today, but it is also necessary to pay attention to who receives the benefits, and who does not.
AB - Supply of non-timber Forest Products (NTFPs) is an important provisioning ecosystem service. It is often argued that forest conservation contributes to poverty alleviation through provisioning of NTFPs to the poor. However, implicit assumptions of the argument that NTFPs are more intensively utilized by poor who lack alternative subsistence options, and that NTFP supplies are limited by forest cover, have rarely been critically examined. This study investigated social and environmental factors affecting NTFP uses in rural areas of Borneo, using a land cover map and socio-economic dataset collected from 1596 households in 87 villages. The NTFPs examined were wild boars, sambar deer, wild fruits, firewood, wild vegetables, and wild mushrooms. To explain the variations in NTFP uses among households, four village and nine household characteristics were considered using generalized linear mixed models. We found that forest cover and collection pressure limit the use of some NTFPs, supporting the second assumption. On the other hand, the first assumption was supported only for firewood, and animals and wild fruits were more frequently used by wealthier households, contrary to this assumption. Other factors (education, age and sex of householder and agricultural activities) were also related to the use of one or more NTFPs. This study demonstrates the complexity of the process by which forest cover and other factors affect the ecosystem services people receive. Evaluation of ecosystem services is an important and urgent research subject today, but it is also necessary to pay attention to who receives the benefits, and who does not.
KW - Ecosystem services
KW - Questionnaire survey
KW - Land cover
KW - Poverty alleviation
KW - Sarawak
KW - Tropical forests
UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85006262206&doi=10.1016%2fj.biocon.2016.10.022&partnerID=40&md5=170ccf5be7696c9fe21131e8dc41d699
U2 - 10.1016/j.biocon.2016.10.022
DO - 10.1016/j.biocon.2016.10.022
M3 - Journal article
SN - 0006-3207
VL - 204, Part B
SP - 340
EP - 349
JO - Biological Conservation
JF - Biological Conservation
ER -