Should I use my ‘weak’ social capital or ‘strong’ guanxi? Reviewing and critiquing two theories in the context of Western-Chinese migration

Zhuqin Feng*, Roger Patulny

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Social network dynamics are complex in the context of Chinese overseas migration because of the unique dynamics of guanxi, which are distinctly different from ‘Western’ social capital. The few migration studies comparing guanxi and social capital suggest that the former largely consists ‘strong ties’, while the latter is comprised of ‘weak ties’. However, most apply only a cursory comparison of one network facet. We review core literature in the two fields to contrast what each says about network norms, structures and practices. We find that: (i) guanxi is characterised by dynamics of ‘face’ and renqing; (ii) guanxi has core and peripheral aspects that grant it bonding and bridging qualities; (iii) weak ties in social capital networks are more beneficial for acquiring non-redundant resources, and for joining civic/voluntary associations; (iv) while strong, face-based guanxi ties better mobilise valuable resources, these ties are rarely transformed into social capital.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)464-482
Number of pages19
JournalJournal of Sociology
Volume57
Issue number2
Early online date7 Jun 2020
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2021

Scopus Subject Areas

  • Sociology and Political Science

User-Defined Keywords

  • face
  • guanxi
  • reciprocity
  • social capital
  • ties
  • trust

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Should I use my ‘weak’ social capital or ‘strong’ guanxi? Reviewing and critiquing two theories in the context of Western-Chinese migration'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this