Shoe collar height and heel counter-stiffness for shoe cushioning and joint stability in landing

Wing Kai Lam*, Chris Chi Wai Cheung, Aaron Kam Lun Leung

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articlepeer-review

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study examined the effects of shoe collar-height and counter-stiffness on ground reaction force (GRF), ankle and knee mechanics in landing. Eighteen university basketball players performed drop landing when wearing shoes in different collar height (high vs. low) and counter-stiffness (stiffer vs. less stiff). Biomechanical variables were measured with force platform and motion capturing systems. Two-way repeated measures ANOVA was performed with α = 0.05. Wearing high collar shoes exhibited smaller peak ankle dorsiflexion and total sagittal RoM, peak knee extension moment, but larger peak knee varus moment than the low collar shoes. Stiffer counter-stiffness shoes related to smaller ankle inversion at touchdown and total coronal RoM, but larger peak knee flexion and increased total ankle and knee sagittal RoM than the less stiff counter-stiffness. Furthermore, wearing stiffer counter-stiffness shoes increased forefoot GRF peak at high collar condition, while no significant differences between counter-stiffness at low collar condition. These results suggest that although higher collar height and/or stiffness heel counter used can reduce ankle motion in coronal plane, it would increase the motion and loading at knee joint, which is susceptible to knee injuries. These findings could be insightful for training and footwear development in basketball.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2374-2381
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Sports Sciences
Volume38
Issue number20
Early online date30 Jun 2020
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 17 Oct 2020

User-Defined Keywords

  • ground reaction force
  • Impact attenuation
  • joint moment
  • kinematics
  • kinetics

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Shoe collar height and heel counter-stiffness for shoe cushioning and joint stability in landing'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this