Semeiotic completeness in the theory of signs

Ahti Veikko Pietarinen

doi:10.1515/sem-2018-0151

Semeiotic completeness in the theory of signs

Ahti Veikko Pietarinen^*

^*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Peirce aspired for the completeness of his logic cum the theory of signs in his 1903 Lowell Lectures and other late manuscripts. Semeiotic completeness states that everything that is a consequence in logical critic is derivable in speculative grammar. The present paper exposes the reasons why Peirce would fall short of establishing semeiotic completeness and thus why he would not continue seeking a perfect match between the theories of grammar and critic. Some alternative notions are then proposed.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	237-257
Number of pages	21
Journal	Semiotica
Volume	2019
Issue number	228
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1515/sem-2018-0151
Publication status	Published - 2 May 2019
Externally published	Yes

Scopus Subject Areas

Language and Linguistics
Linguistics and Language
Literature and Literary Theory

User-Defined Keywords

Peirce
logic
theory of signs
completeness
categoricity

Access to Document

10.1515/sem-2018-0151

Cite this

@article{019623068cfb45c2872f3b3707da40e4,

title = "Semeiotic completeness in the theory of signs",

abstract = "Peirce aspired for the completeness of his logic cum the theory of signs in his 1903 Lowell Lectures and other late manuscripts. Semeiotic completeness states that everything that is a consequence in logical critic is derivable in speculative grammar. The present paper exposes the reasons why Peirce would fall short of establishing semeiotic completeness and thus why he would not continue seeking a perfect match between the theories of grammar and critic. Some alternative notions are then proposed.",

keywords = "Peirce, logic, theory of signs, completeness, categoricity",

author = "Pietarinen, {Ahti Veikko}",

note = "Funding Information: Research supported by the Estonian Research Council (PUT 1305, Abduction in the Age of Fundamental Uncertainty) and the Russian Academic Excellence Project “5–100”. Thanks to Frederik Stjernfelt, Francesco Bellucci, and reviewers of the present journal for comments on earlier versions of the present work. Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston",

year = "2019",

month = may,

day = "2",

doi = "10.1515/sem-2018-0151",

language = "English",

volume = "2019",

pages = "237--257",

journal = "Semiotica",

issn = "0037-1998",

publisher = "De Gruyter Mouton",

number = "228",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Semeiotic completeness in the theory of signs

AU - Pietarinen, Ahti Veikko

N1 - Funding Information: Research supported by the Estonian Research Council (PUT 1305, Abduction in the Age of Fundamental Uncertainty) and the Russian Academic Excellence Project “5–100”. Thanks to Frederik Stjernfelt, Francesco Bellucci, and reviewers of the present journal for comments on earlier versions of the present work. Publisher Copyright: © 2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

PY - 2019/5/2

Y1 - 2019/5/2

N2 - Peirce aspired for the completeness of his logic cum the theory of signs in his 1903 Lowell Lectures and other late manuscripts. Semeiotic completeness states that everything that is a consequence in logical critic is derivable in speculative grammar. The present paper exposes the reasons why Peirce would fall short of establishing semeiotic completeness and thus why he would not continue seeking a perfect match between the theories of grammar and critic. Some alternative notions are then proposed.

AB - Peirce aspired for the completeness of his logic cum the theory of signs in his 1903 Lowell Lectures and other late manuscripts. Semeiotic completeness states that everything that is a consequence in logical critic is derivable in speculative grammar. The present paper exposes the reasons why Peirce would fall short of establishing semeiotic completeness and thus why he would not continue seeking a perfect match between the theories of grammar and critic. Some alternative notions are then proposed.

KW - Peirce

KW - logic

KW - theory of signs

KW - completeness

KW - categoricity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85064381427&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1515/sem-2018-0151

DO - 10.1515/sem-2018-0151

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85064381427

SN - 0037-1998

VL - 2019

SP - 237

EP - 257

JO - Semiotica

JF - Semiotica

IS - 228

ER -

Semeiotic completeness in the theory of signs

Abstract

Scopus Subject Areas

User-Defined Keywords

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this